Home : Documents : Posture and Weightbearing Biomechanics
Posture and Weightbearing Biomechanics:
Bone Marrow edema and postural misalignmnet
(Based on article from Journal of Radiology 1996)
Chiropractic theories and
treatment procedures have long been based on the concept that postural stress
resulting from faulty alignment of body segments is a major factor in the
development of
musculoskeletal pain and premature degenerative arthritis. New evidence obtained
from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures has recently helped bridge the
gap between clinical observations and scientific knowledge. These findings
provide support for some of the traditional, posture-based chiropractic
treatment approaches.
Biomechanics and Structure
Because we humans stand and
walk upright against the unrelenting force of gravity, our bodies are exposed
to constant stress. Normally our rigid yet pliable bones when constrained by
flexible ligaments and moved by muscles with sufficient strength, provide good
support against this constant stress. When the alignment of body parts is
altered, the stresses are changed, and this may lead to various types of
biomechanical problems. Both the soft tissues and bones must respond to these
changes or be damaged. Microtrauma (the small but repeated damage to tissues)
eventually is revealed as a clinical complaint (usually pain) prior to any
overt signs of physical injury. The reduction or removal of biomechanical
misalignments is a rational treatment approach followed by many doctors of
chiropractic, and is frequently effective.
Recent Research
A recent study by Schweitzer
and White, from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, has demonstrated the
almost immediate physiologic effects of changes in alignment of
weightbearing bones, and
gives evidence to suggest that there are detrimental results of long-term
misalignments.1 They found that after only two weeks of enforced abnormal
weightbearing, the bones of
normal subjects showed MRI evidence of the development of the earliest stages
of stress fractures, "bone marrow edema."
Methods
A baseline-limited MRI
examination was performed on both lower extremities of 12 asymptomatic
volunteers; then the volunteer subjects inserted a 9/16 inch longitudinal
metatarsal arch pad
underneath the lateral aspect of one foot to increase unilateral foot
pronation. They were instructed to wear this pad in all shoes for two weeks,
and not to alter their usual activities. After
two weeks of altered weightbearing, follow-up MRI studies were obtained in all
subjects. The pads were then removed from all volunteers, and a small group was
randomly chosen for a third MRI evaluation two weeks later.
Results
The images obtained after two
weeks of altered foot biomechanics showed numerous areas of increased marrow
signal intensity on the T2-weighted (fat-suppressed) images, indicating bone
marrow edema in 11 of the 12 subjects. These changes were seen locally (as
expected) throughout the metatarsophalangeal region. More importantly, bone
marrow changes were also seen in the long bones along the kinetic chain to the
hip joint, affecting the tibia and/or femur of six of the 12 volunteers.
Two weeks after removal of
the pads, the lower extremities of three randomly selected subjects were again
evaluated by MRI. The previously seen marrow changes were significantly
decreased in all, and had completely resolved in two of the three. Clinically
all of the volunteers complained of discomfort while wearing the foot pad,
which resolved completely upon its removal.
Discussion
When bone is exposed to
excessive, long term stress, it responds by attempting to repair and strengthen
its internal architecture. A stress fracture results when the repair process is overwhelmed, and the bone
tissue fails. If additional bone can be laid down fast enough, a stress
fracture is avoided. But the additional bone tissue may increase the bone's
rigidity, accelerating the development
of cartilage damage at the adjacent weight bearing joint. This stiffening of
subchondral bone is considered to be a significant contributor to premature degenerative changes in
weight bearing joints.2
Diagnostic Imaging- Plain
Film Radiography
Plain film radiographs are
insensitive to the early changes in bone associated with biomechanical lesions
(bone marrow edema, early stress fracture, etc.). It is only after extensive biomechanical stress has been
imposed, either in the short term (causing a stress fracture), or in the long
term (resulting in premature degenerative arthritis), that these conditions can be visualized on plain
films.3 Stress fractures are usually seen as subtle areas of periosteal
response without evidence of cortical or medullary abnormality. With sustained
stress injury, linear areas of sclerosis
and even a fracture line may eventually be observed. Degenerative joint disease
(DJD) is the most commonly seen result of long-standing altered weightbearing.3 The eight
essential radiographic signs of DJD include: asymmetric distribution; non-uniform
loss of joint space; osteophytes; subchondral sclerosis (eburnation); subchondral cysts (geodes);
intra-articular bodies; articular deformity; and subluxation.3
Advanced Imaging
The most sensitive imaging
modality to detect early stress injury to bone is magnetic resonance imaging.
MRI provides not only good anatomical localization, but also gives useful physiological information
concerning bone tissue. Bone marrow edema is identified by a diffuse,
heterogeneous pattern of decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images that becomes hyperintense (white)
with T2-weighting. Specialized T2-weighted fat suppression (STIR) images are
often necessary to identify small areas of marrow alteration. Regions containing free water (edema)
within the fatty marrow can be identified much more readily with MRI than with
a bone scan or any other imaging modality.4
Conclusion
Although little direct
evidence has previously been presented to substantiate posture-based
chiropractic treatment approaches, these techniques have survived because of
positive clinical results and anecdotal information. Using MRI information,
early physiologic changes in bones in response to altered biomechanical stress
(e.g., bone marrow edema) can be observed. We think this recent finding is of
major significance to chiropractors for two reasons. First, the results
demonstrate not only the detrimental effects of altered biomechanics on bones
and joints, but also the rapid benefits of the removal of functional
misalignments. Secondly, this paper provides direct evidence of the specific
effects of excessive pronation at the foot and ankle on the bones of the lower
extremities, up to the level of the proximal femur and hip joint. Application
of the concepts and information presented in this research helps reinforce the
long-held chiropractic premise that inequality in weightbearing is clinically
important.
References
1. Schweitzer ME, White LM. Does altered biomechanics
cause marrow edema? Radiology 1996: 198: 851-853
2. Resnick D, Niwayana G. Diagnosis of Bone and Joint
Disorders, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1988: 1371.
3. Yochum TR, Rowe LJ. Essentials of Skeletal Radiology,
2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1996: 804.
4. Mink JH, Deutsch AL. Occult cartilage and bone
injuries of the knee: detection, classification and assessment with MR imaging.
Radiology 1989; 170: 823.
Authors: John Hyland, D.C.,
DACBR, DABCO.
Terry Yochum, D.C.,DACBR,
FCCR(C), FICC.
Michael Barry, D.C., DACBR